Giveaways

LAMZU Paro vs Zowie EC3-CW vs LAMZU Thorn - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The LAMZU Paro is larger than the LAMZU Thorn, and slightly larger than the Zowie EC3-CW. The LAMZU Paro weighs 8% less than the LAMZU Thorn, and 37% less than the Zowie EC3-CW. Both the LAMZU Paro and LAMZU Thorn have a better sensor (PixArt PAW3395) than the Zowie EC3-CW (PixArt PAW3370). Both the LAMZU Paro and LAMZU Thorn have the highest max DPI of 26000, while Zowie EC3-CW has a max DPI of 3200. Both the LAMZU Paro and LAMZU Thorn use the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the Zowie EC3-CW uses the Huano Black Shell Blue Dot mechanical switches rated for 10 million clicks. The LAMZU Paro uses a optical encoder, while the Zowie EC3-CW uses the Zowie Optical (24 steps) encoder, while the LAMZU Thorn uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. The LAMZU Paro has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Zowie EC3-CW has a polling rate of 1000 Hz, and the LAMZU Thorn has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. All mice are wireless.

LAMZU Paro vs Zowie EC3-CW vs LAMZU Thorn - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Medium Medium
Length
mm
120.0 119.0 119.0
Width
mm
65.0 66.0 65.0
Height
mm
40.0 41.0 42.0
Weight
grams
48.0 76.0 52.0
Category
Ergonomic Ergonomic Ergonomic
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center Center
Front flare
Outward - slight Outward - moderate Outward - slight
Side curvature
Inward Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Forward (55%) Centered (52%) Forward (54%)
MCU
DPI
26000 3200 26000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 1000 1000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 400 650
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Wired
Yes
Yes
Yes
Wireless (2.4 GHz)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
No
Yes
No
Hot-swap battery
No
No
No
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Material
Plastic Plastic Plastic