Giveaways

LAMZU Thorn 4K vs Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium is slightly larger than the LAMZU Thorn 4K. The LAMZU Thorn 4K weighs 5% less than the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium. The LAMZU Thorn 4K uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder, while the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder. The LAMZU Thorn 4K has the highest polling rate of 4000 Hz, while the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. Both mice have a max DPI of 26000. Both mice use the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks. Both mice are wireless.

LAMZU Thorn 4K vs Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Medium
Length
mm
119.0 122.0
Width
mm
65.0 66.0
Height
mm
42.0 43.0
Weight
grams
52.0 55.0
Category
Ergonomic Ergonomic
Hand compatibility
Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center
Front flare
Outward - slight Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical
Position
Forward (54%) Forward (54%)
MCU
DPI
26000 26000
Polling rate
Hz
4000 1000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 650
Acceleration
G
50 50
Wired
Yes
Yes
Wireless (2.4 GHz)
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
No
No
Hot-swap battery
No
No
Side buttons
2 2
Middle buttons
0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Material
Plastic Plastic