Giveaways  
NEW

ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 vs Duckbill vs F1 Extreme - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 is larger than both the ATK F1 Extreme and ATK Duckbill. The ATK F1 Extreme weighs 24% less than the ATK Duckbill, and 34% less than the ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0. Both the ATK Duckbill and ATK F1 Extreme have a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 Ultra) than the ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 (PixArt PAW3395 Ultra). Both the ATK Duckbill and ATK F1 Extreme have the highest max DPI of 42000, while ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 has a max DPI of 30000. The ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 uses the ATK Light Blade mechanical switches, while the ATK Duckbill uses the FE Advanced Optical Switch rated for 100 million clicks, while the ATK F1 Extreme uses the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks. Both the ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 and ATK Duckbill use the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the ATK F1 Extreme uses the mechanical F-Switch Encoder. All mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. All mice are wireless.

ATK A9 Ultra Max 2.0 vs Duckbill vs F1 Extreme - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Large Small Medium
Length
mm
125.0 118.0 118.2
Width
mm
64.0 62.5 62.4
Height
mm
40.0 37.4 38.8
Weight
grams
53.0 46.0 35.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Center Back - moderate Back - minimal
Front flare
Outward - slight Outward - slight Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Flat Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Centered (52%) Centered (53%) Centered (50%)
DPI
30000 42000 42000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 8000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 750 750
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Plastic Plastic