Giveaways

ATK GHOST Extreme vs GHOST Ultimate vs Delux M800 Pro vs Razer Viper Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The Delux M800 Pro is slightly larger than the ATK GHOST Extreme, the ATK GHOST Ultimate, and Razer Viper Mini. The ATK GHOST Extreme weighs 0% less than the ATK GHOST Ultimate, 21% less than the Razer Viper Mini, and 31% less than the Delux M800 Pro. Both the ATK GHOST Extreme and ATK GHOST Ultimate have a better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 Ultra) than the Delux M800 Pro (PixArt PAW3370), and a much better sensor than the Razer Viper Mini (PixArt PMW3359). Both the ATK GHOST Extreme and ATK GHOST Ultimate have the highest max DPI of 42000, while Delux M800 Pro has a max DPI of 19000, and Razer Viper Mini has a max DPI of 8500. The ATK GHOST Extreme uses the ATK Optical Switches rated for 100 million clicks, while the ATK GHOST Ultimate uses the ATK Light Blade mechanical switches, while the Delux M800 Pro uses the Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks, while the Razer Viper Mini uses the Razer Optical Mouse Switches rated for 70 million clicks. Both the ATK GHOST Extreme and ATK GHOST Ultimate use the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the Delux M800 Pro uses the Huano Red mechanical encoder, while the Razer Viper Mini uses the Kailh Black mechanical encoder. The ATK GHOST Extreme has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the ATK GHOST Ultimate has a polling rate of 8000 Hz, and the Delux M800 Pro has a polling rate of 1000 Hz, while the Razer Viper Mini has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. The ATK GHOST Extreme and the ATK GHOST Ultimate and the Delux M800 Pro are wireless, while the Razer Viper Mini is wired. Both the ATK GHOST Extreme and ATK GHOST Ultimate are made from carbon fiber composite, while both the Delux M800 Pro and Razer Viper Mini are made from plastic.

ATK GHOST Extreme vs GHOST Ultimate vs Delux M800 Pro vs Razer Viper Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Medium Medium Medium
Length
mm
121.0 121.0 124.0 119.0
Width
mm
61.3 61.3 64.0 62.0
Height
mm
38.0 38.0 38.0 39.0
Weight
grams
48.0 48.0 70.0 61.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right Right
Hump placement
Back - minimal Back - minimal Back - minimal Back - minimal
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - moderate Outward - moderate Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical Optical
Position
Centered (53%) Centered (53%) Forward (54%) Centered (50%)
DPI
42000 42000 19000 8500
Polling rate
Hz
8000 8000 1000 1000
Tracking speed
IPS
750 750 400 300
Acceleration
G
50 50 50 35
Side buttons
2 2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 1 1
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless Wireless Wired
Material
Carbon fiber composite Carbon fiber composite Plastic Plastic