Attack Shark R1 vs AULA V9+ - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The AULA V9+ is slightly larger than the Attack Shark R1. The Attack Shark R1 weighs 2% less than the AULA V9+. The AULA V9+ has a much better sensor (PixArt PAW3395) than the Attack Shark R1 (PixArt PAW3311). The AULA V9+ has the highest max DPI of 26000, while Attack Shark R1 has a max DPI of 18000. The Attack Shark R1 uses the Huano Blue Shell White Dot mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks, while the AULA V9+ uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(100M) mechanical switches rated for 100 million clicks. The Attack Shark R1 uses the mechanical F-Switch Encoder, while the AULA V9+ uses the TTC Gold mechanical encoder. The AULA V9+ has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Attack Shark R1 has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. The Attack Shark R1 has an ergonomic shape, while the AULA V9+ has a symmetrical shape. Both mice are wireless.
Attack Shark R1 | AULA V9+ | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Large |
Length mm | 123.5 | 125.4 |
Width mm | 64.0 | 63.7 |
Height mm | 41.0 | 39.9 |
Weight grams | 59.0 | 60.0 |
Category | Ergonomic | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Center |
Front flare | Outward - moderate | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Inward | Flat |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (57%) | Centered (50%) |
DPI | 18000 | 26000 |
Polling rate Hz | 1000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 300 | 650 |
Acceleration G | 35 | 50 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 1 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Huano Blue Shell White Dot Mechanical 20M | Omron D2FC-F-7N(100M) Mechanical 100M |
Encoder | F-Switch Encoder | TTC Gold |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wireless |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |