Attack Shark V8 vs HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The Attack Shark V8 weighs 38% less than the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro. The Attack Shark V8 has a much better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 Max) than the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro (PixArt PMW3389). The Attack Shark V8 has the highest max DPI of 42000, while HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro has a max DPI of 16000. The Attack Shark V8 uses the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, while the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(20M) mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks. The Attack Shark V8 uses the mechanical F-Switch Encoder, while the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro uses the Kailh Red mechanical encoder. The Attack Shark V8 has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. The Attack Shark V8 is wireless, while the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro is wired. Both the Attack Shark V8 and the HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro are the same size.
Attack Shark V8 | HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Large | Large |
Length mm | 127.7 | 127.6 |
Width mm | 67.8 | 71.1 |
Height mm | 42.8 | 41.9 |
Weight grams | 59.0 | 95.0 |
Category | Ergonomic | Ergonomic |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Back - minimal |
Front flare | Outward - slight | Outward - aggressive |
Side curvature | Flat | Flat |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (55%) | Forward (58%) |
MCU | - | |
DPI | 42000 | 16000 |
Polling rate Hz | 8000 | 1000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 750 | 400 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Wired | Yes | Yes |
Wireless (2.4 GHz) | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | No |
Hot-swap battery | No | No |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 1 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Omron Optical Optical 70M | Omron D2FC-F-7N(20M) Mechanical 20M |
Encoder | F-Switch Encoder | Kailh Red |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |