Attack Shark X11 vs Razer DeathAdder Essential - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The Razer DeathAdder Essential is slightly larger than the Attack Shark X11. The Attack Shark X11 weighs 34% less than the Razer DeathAdder Essential. The Attack Shark X11 has a better sensor (PixArt PAW3311) than the Razer DeathAdder Essential (PixArt PAW3328). The Attack Shark X11 has the highest max DPI of 22000, while Razer DeathAdder Essential has a max DPI of 6400. The Attack Shark X11 uses the Huano Blue Shell White Dot mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(10M) mechanical switches rated for 10 million clicks. The Attack Shark X11 uses a mechanical encoder, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential uses the Kailh Red mechanical encoder. The Attack Shark X11 is wireless, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential is wired. The Attack Shark X11 has a symmetrical shape, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential has an ergonomic shape. Both mice have a polling rate of 1000 Hz.
Attack Shark X11 | Razer DeathAdder Essential | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Large | Large |
Length mm | 128.0 | 127.0 |
Width mm | 64.0 | 70.0 |
Height mm | 40.0 | 42.7 |
Weight grams | 63.0 | 96.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Ergonomic |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Back - minimal | Center |
Front flare | Outward - slight | Outward - aggressive |
Side curvature | Flat | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (54%) | Forward (55%) |
DPI | 22000 | 6400 |
Polling rate Hz | 1000 | 1000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 300 | 220 |
Acceleration G | 35 | 30 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Huano Blue Shell White Dot Mechanical 20M | Omron D2FC-F-7N(10M) Mechanical 10M |
Encoder | TTC Unspecified | Kailh Red |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wired |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |