Giveaways

Darmoshark M2 vs WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The Darmoshark M2 is slightly larger than the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro. The WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro weighs 13% less than the Darmoshark M2. The WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 HS) than the Darmoshark M2 (PixArt PAW3395). The WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro has the highest max DPI of 30000, while Darmoshark M2 has a max DPI of 26000. The Darmoshark M2 uses the TTC Azure Dragon mechanical switches rated for 100 million clicks, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The Darmoshark M2 uses the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. The WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Darmoshark M2 has a polling rate of 4000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.

Darmoshark M2 vs WLMOUSE Beast X Mini Pro - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Small Small
Length
mm
115.8 116.0
Width
mm
60.4 58.0
Height
mm
36.1 35.0
Weight
grams
39.0 34.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right
Hump placement
Back - minimal Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical
Position
Forward (54%) Centered (50%)
MCU
DPI
26000 30000
Polling rate
Hz
4000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 750
Acceleration
G
50 50
Wired
Yes
Yes
Wireless (2.4 GHz)
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
Yes
No
Hot-swap battery
No
No
Side buttons
2 2
Middle buttons
0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Material
Magnesium Magnesium