Giveaways

Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) vs WLMOUSE Beast X Max - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The WLMOUSE Beast X Max is slightly larger than the Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L). The Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) weighs 12% less than the WLMOUSE Beast X Max. The WLMOUSE Beast X Max has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 HS) than the Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) (PixArt PAW3395). The WLMOUSE Beast X Max has the highest max DPI of 30000, while Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) has a max DPI of 6400. The Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(20M) mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Max has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) uses a mechanical encoder, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Max uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. The Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) is made from carbon fiber composite, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Max is made from magnesium. Both mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.

Finalmouse UltralightX Tiger (L) vs WLMOUSE Beast X Max - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Large Large
Length
mm
126.0 126.0
Width
mm
65.0 65.0
Height
mm
38.4 39.0
Weight
grams
37.0 42.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical
Position
Centered (50%) Centered (52%)
MCU
DPI
6400 30000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 750
Acceleration
G
50 50
Wired
Yes
Yes
Wireless (2.4 GHz)
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
No
No
Hot-swap battery
No
No
Side buttons
2 2
Middle buttons
0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Material
Carbon fiber composite Magnesium