G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K vs WLMOUSE Beast Miao - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K is slightly larger than the WLMOUSE Beast Miao. The G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K weighs 23% less than the WLMOUSE Beast Miao. The WLMOUSE Beast Miao has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 HS) than the G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K (PixArt PAW3395). The WLMOUSE Beast Miao has the highest max DPI of 30000, while G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K has a max DPI of 26000. The G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K uses the Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks, while the WLMOUSE Beast Miao has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K uses the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the WLMOUSE Beast Miao uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. The G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K is made from plastic, while the WLMOUSE Beast Miao is made from magnesium. Both mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
G-Wolves HTR Pro 8K | WLMOUSE Beast Miao | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Fingertip | Fingertip |
Length mm | 92.0 | 91.0 |
Width mm | 57.0 | 55.0 |
Height mm | 33.0 | 34.0 |
Weight grams | 24.0 | 31.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Back - aggressive | Back - aggressive |
Front flare | Inward - slight | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Flat | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (54%) | Centered (49%) |
DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
Polling rate Hz | 8000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 750 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot Mechanical 80M | Omron Optical Optical 70M TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot Mechanical 80M |
Encoder | TTC Gold | TTC Silver |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wireless |
Material | Plastic | Magnesium |