Giveaways

G-Wolves Skoll vs LAMZU Thorn vs Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The G-Wolves Skoll is slightly larger than the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium, and larger than the LAMZU Thorn. The LAMZU Thorn weighs 5% less than the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium, and 21% less than the G-Wolves Skoll. Both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium have a much better sensor (PixArt PAW3395) than the G-Wolves Skoll (PixArt PMW3360). Both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium have the highest max DPI of 26000, while G-Wolves Skoll has a max DPI of 12000. The G-Wolves Skoll uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(20M) mechanical switches rated for 20 million clicks, while both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium use the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks. The G-Wolves Skoll uses the mechanical F-Switch Encoder, while the LAMZU Thorn uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder, while the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder. The LAMZU Thorn and the Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium are wireless, while the G-Wolves Skoll is wired. All mice have a polling rate of 1000 Hz.

G-Wolves Skoll vs LAMZU Thorn vs Pulsar Xlite v3 Medium - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Large Medium Medium
Length
mm
125.0 119.0 122.0
Width
mm
68.0 65.0 66.0
Height
mm
42.0 42.0 43.0
Weight
grams
66.0 52.0 55.0
Category
Ergonomic Ergonomic Ergonomic
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - slight Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Centered (50%) Forward (54%) Forward (54%)
DPI
12000 26000 26000
Polling rate
Hz
1000 1000 1000
Tracking speed
IPS
250 650 650
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wired Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Plastic Plastic