Hitscan Hyperlight vs LAMZU Inca vs MAYA X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The LAMZU MAYA X is slightly larger than the LAMZU Inca, and larger than the Hitscan Hyperlight. The Hitscan Hyperlight weighs 3% less than the LAMZU Inca, and 17% less than the LAMZU MAYA X. Both the LAMZU Inca and LAMZU MAYA X have a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950) than the Hitscan Hyperlight (PixArt PAW3395). Both the LAMZU Inca and LAMZU MAYA X have the highest max DPI of 30000, while Hitscan Hyperlight has a max DPI of 26000. Both the Hitscan Hyperlight and LAMZU Inca use the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the LAMZU MAYA X uses the mechanical LAMZU Encoder. All mice use the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks. All mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. All mice are wireless.

Hitscan Hyperlight vs LAMZU Inca vs MAYA X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Small Medium Large
Length
mm
118.0 122.0 124.4
Width
mm
61.0 63.0 64.9
Height
mm
38.0 40.0 39.6
Weight
grams
39.0 40.0 47.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Back - minimal Back - aggressive Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - slight Outward - slight
Side curvature
Inward Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Forward (58%) Centered (52%) Forward (54%)
DPI
26000 30000 30000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 8000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 750 750
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Plastic Plastic