Hitscan Hyperlight vs LAMZU MAYA X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The LAMZU MAYA X is larger than the Hitscan Hyperlight. The Hitscan Hyperlight weighs 17% less than the LAMZU MAYA X. The LAMZU MAYA X has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950) than the Hitscan Hyperlight (PixArt PAW3395). The LAMZU MAYA X has the highest max DPI of 30000, while Hitscan Hyperlight has a max DPI of 26000. The Hitscan Hyperlight uses the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the LAMZU MAYA X uses the mechanical LAMZU Encoder. Both mice use the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks. Both mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
Hitscan Hyperlight | LAMZU MAYA X | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Large |
Length mm | 118.0 | 124.4 |
Width mm | 61.0 | 64.9 |
Height mm | 38.8 | 39.6 |
Weight grams | 39.0 | 47.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Back - minimal | Center |
Front flare | Outward - moderate | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Inward | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (56%) | Forward (54%) |
DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
Polling rate Hz | 8000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 750 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Omron Optical Optical 70M | Omron Optical Optical 70M |
Encoder | TTC Gold | LAMZU Encoder |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wireless |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |