Hitscan Hyperlight vs WLMOUSE Beast X vs LAMZU MAYA X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The LAMZU MAYA X is slightly larger than the WLMOUSE Beast X, and larger than the Hitscan Hyperlight. The Hitscan Hyperlight weighs 0% less than the WLMOUSE Beast X, and 17% less than the LAMZU MAYA X. The LAMZU MAYA X has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950) than the Hitscan Hyperlight (PixArt PAW3395) and the WLMOUSE Beast X (PixArt PAW3395). The LAMZU MAYA X has the highest max DPI of 30000, while both the Hitscan Hyperlight and WLMOUSE Beast X have a max DPI of 26000. Both the Hitscan Hyperlight and WLMOUSE Beast X use the TTC Gold mechanical encoder, while the LAMZU MAYA X uses the mechanical LAMZU Encoder. The Hitscan Hyperlight has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the LAMZU MAYA X has a polling rate of 8000 Hz, and the WLMOUSE Beast X has a polling rate of 4000 Hz. Both the Hitscan Hyperlight and LAMZU MAYA X are made from plastic, while the WLMOUSE Beast X is made from magnesium. All mice use the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks. All mice are wireless.

Hitscan Hyperlight vs WLMOUSE Beast X vs LAMZU MAYA X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Small Medium Large
Length
mm
118.0 122.0 124.4
Width
mm
61.0 62.0 64.9
Height
mm
38.0 37.0 39.6
Weight
grams
39.0 39.0 47.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Back - minimal Center Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - moderate Outward - slight
Side curvature
Inward Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Forward (58%) Centered (52%) Forward (54%)
DPI
26000 26000 30000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 4000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 650 750
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Magnesium Plastic