Giveaways

HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless vs WLMOUSE Beast X Max - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The WLMOUSE Beast X Max is slightly larger than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless. The WLMOUSE Beast X Max weighs 30% less than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless. The WLMOUSE Beast X Max has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950 HS) than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless (HyperX 26K). The WLMOUSE Beast X Max has the highest max DPI of 30000, while HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless has a max DPI of 26000. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless uses the mechanical HyperX Switches rated for 100 million clicks, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Max has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The WLMOUSE Beast X Max has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless is made from plastic, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Max is made from magnesium. Both mice use the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. Both mice are wireless.

HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Wireless vs WLMOUSE Beast X Max - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Large
Length
mm
124.2 126.0
Width
mm
66.8 65.0
Height
mm
38.2 39.0
Weight
grams
60.0 42.0
Category
Symmetrical Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center
Front flare
Flat Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Flat Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical
Position
Forward (54%) Centered (52%)
MCU
DPI
26000 30000
Polling rate
Hz
1000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 750
Acceleration
G
50 50
Wired
Yes
Yes
Wireless (2.4 GHz)
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
Yes
No
Hot-swap battery
No
No
Side buttons
2 2
Middle buttons
1 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Material
Plastic Magnesium