HyperX Pulsefire Haste vs Razer DeathAdder Essential - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The Razer DeathAdder Essential is larger than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste weighs 39% less than the Razer DeathAdder Essential. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste has a better sensor (PixArt PAW3335) than the Razer DeathAdder Essential (PixArt PAW3328). The HyperX Pulsefire Haste has the highest max DPI of 16000, while Razer DeathAdder Essential has a max DPI of 6400. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste uses the TTC Dustproof Gold 60M mechanical switches rated for 60 million clicks, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential uses the Omron D2FC-F-7N(10M) mechanical switches rated for 10 million clicks. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential uses the Kailh Red mechanical encoder. The HyperX Pulsefire Haste has a symmetrical shape, while the Razer DeathAdder Essential has an ergonomic shape. Both mice have a polling rate of 1000 Hz. Both mice are wired.
HyperX Pulsefire Haste | Razer DeathAdder Essential | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Large |
Length mm | 124.2 | 127.0 |
Width mm | 66.8 | 70.0 |
Height mm | 38.2 | 42.7 |
Weight grams | 59.0 | 96.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Ergonomic |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Center |
Front flare | Flat | Outward - aggressive |
Side curvature | Flat | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (54%) | Forward (55%) |
DPI | 16000 | 6400 |
Polling rate Hz | 1000 | 1000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 400 | 220 |
Acceleration G | 40 | 30 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 1 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | TTC Dustproof Gold 60M Mechanical 60M | Omron D2FC-F-7N(10M) Mechanical 10M |
Encoder | TTC Silver | Kailh Red |
Connectivity | Wired | Wired |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |