Giveaways

LAMZU Thorn vs Pulsar X2H Mini vs X3 Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The Pulsar X3 Mini is slightly larger than the LAMZU Thorn, and larger than the Pulsar X2H Mini. The Pulsar X3 Mini weighs 4% less than the LAMZU Thorn, and 4% less than the Pulsar X2H Mini. The Pulsar X3 Mini has a slightly better sensor (Pulsar XS-1) than the LAMZU Thorn (PixArt PAW3395) and the Pulsar X2H Mini (PixArt PAW3395). The Pulsar X3 Mini has the highest max DPI of 32000, while both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar X2H Mini have a max DPI of 26000. Both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar X2H Mini use the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the Pulsar X3 Mini uses the Kailh Optical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The LAMZU Thorn uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder, while both the Pulsar X2H Mini and Pulsar X3 Mini use the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder. The Pulsar X3 Mini has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the LAMZU Thorn has a polling rate of 1000 Hz, and the Pulsar X2H Mini has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. Both the LAMZU Thorn and Pulsar X3 Mini have an ergonomic shape, while the Pulsar X2H Mini has a symmetrical shape. All mice are wireless.

LAMZU Thorn vs Pulsar X2H Mini vs X3 Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Small Medium
Length
mm
119.0 115.6 119.8
Width
mm
65.0 62.0 66.6
Height
mm
42.0 38.0 41.4
Weight
grams
52.0 52.0 50.0
Category
Ergonomic Symmetrical Ergonomic
Hand compatibility
Right Right Right
Hump placement
Center Back - aggressive Back - moderate
Front flare
Outward - slight Outward - slight Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward Flat
Thumb rest
No
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical Optical
Position
Forward (54%) Centered (51%) Centered (51%)
DPI
26000 26000 32000
Polling rate
Hz
1000 1000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 650 750
Acceleration
G
50 50 50
Side buttons
2 2 2
Middle buttons
0 0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Plastic Plastic