Pulsar X2H eS vs Scyrox V8 - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The Pulsar X2H eS is slightly larger than the Scyrox V8. The Scyrox V8 weighs 42% less than the Pulsar X2H eS. The Scyrox V8 has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950) than the Pulsar X2H eS (PixArt PAW3395). The Scyrox V8 has the highest max DPI of 30000, while Pulsar X2H eS has a max DPI of 26000. The Pulsar X2H eS uses the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the Scyrox V8 has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the Kailh Optical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The Pulsar X2H eS uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder, while the Scyrox V8 uses the mechanical F-Switch Encoder. Both mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
Pulsar X2H eS | Scyrox V8 | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Medium |
Length mm | 120.4 | 118.0 |
Width mm | 65.0 | 63.0 |
Height mm | 39.1 | 38.0 |
Weight grams | 62.0 | 36.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Back - aggressive | Back - aggressive |
Front flare | Outward - slight | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Inward | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (55%) | Forward (54%) |
DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
Polling rate Hz | 8000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 750 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | RAESHA Optical Optical 90M | Omron Optical Optical 70M Kailh Optical Optical 80M |
Encoder | Pulsar Blue Encoder | F-Switch Encoder |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wireless |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |