Pulsar X2H vs LAMZU Maya X - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The LAMZU Maya X is slightly larger than the Pulsar X2H. The LAMZU Maya X weighs 13% less than the Pulsar X2H. The LAMZU Maya X has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW3950) than the Pulsar X2H (PixArt PAW3395). The LAMZU Maya X has the highest max DPI of 30000, while Pulsar X2H has a max DPI of 26000. The Pulsar X2H uses the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the LAMZU Maya X uses the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks. The Pulsar X2H uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder, while the LAMZU Maya X uses the TTC Gold mechanical encoder. The LAMZU Maya X has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Pulsar X2H has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
Pulsar X2H | LAMZU Maya X | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Large |
Length mm | 120.4 | 124.4 |
Width mm | 65.0 | 64.9 |
Height mm | 39.1 | 39.6 |
Weight grams | 54.0 | 47.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Back - aggressive | Center |
Front flare | Outward - slight | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Inward | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Centered (51%) | Forward (54%) |
MCU | ||
DPI | 26000 | 30000 |
Polling rate Hz | 1000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 750 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Wired | Yes (USB-C) | Yes (USB-C) |
Wireless | Yes (2.4 GHz) | Yes (2.4 GHz) |
Bluetooth | No | No |
Hot-swap battery | No | No |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | RAESHA Optical Optical 90M | Omron Optical Optical 70M |
Encoder | Pulsar Blue Encoder Mechanical 24 steps | TTC Gold Mechanical 24 steps |
Free spin | No | No |
Side tilt | No | No |
Thumb wheel | No | No |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |