Pulsar Xlite v3 eS vs WLMOUSE Beast X Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes

The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS is much larger than the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini. The WLMOUSE Beast X Mini weighs 48% less than the Pulsar Xlite v3 eS. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS uses the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini has the option between the Omron Optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and the TTC Nihil Transparent Black Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini uses the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS has an ergonomic shape, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini has a symmetrical shape. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS is made from plastic, while the WLMOUSE Beast X Mini is made from magnesium. Both mice have a max DPI of 26000. Both mice have a polling rate of 8000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.

Pulsar Xlite v3 eS vs WLMOUSE Beast X Mini - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
Category
Medium Small
Length
mm
122.0 116.0
Width
mm
67.0 58.0
Height
mm
43.0 35.0
Weight
grams
65.0 34.0
Category
Ergonomic Symmetrical
Hand compatibility
Right Right
Hump placement
Center Center
Front flare
Outward - moderate Outward - moderate
Side curvature
Inward Inward
Thumb rest
No
No
Ring finger rest
No
No
Name
Type
Optical Optical
Position
Forward (56%) Centered (52%)
DPI
26000 26000
Polling rate
Hz
8000 8000
Tracking speed
IPS
650 650
Acceleration
G
50 50
Side buttons
2 2
Middle buttons
0 0
Hot-swap switches
No
No
Switches
Encoder
Connectivity
Wireless Wireless
Material
Plastic Magnesium