Pulsar Xlite v3 eS vs Zowie EC2-CW - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The Zowie EC2-CW is slightly larger than the Pulsar Xlite v3 eS. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS weighs 16% less than the Zowie EC2-CW. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS has a better sensor (PixArt PAW3395) than the Zowie EC2-CW (PixArt PAW3370). The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS has the highest max DPI of 26000, while Zowie EC2-CW has a max DPI of 3200. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS uses the RAESHA Optical switches rated for 90 million clicks, while the Zowie EC2-CW uses the Huano Black Shell Blue Dot mechanical switches rated for 10 million clicks. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS uses the mechanical Pulsar Blue Encoder, while the Zowie EC2-CW uses the Zowie Optical (24 steps) encoder. The Pulsar Xlite v3 eS has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Zowie EC2-CW has a polling rate of 1000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
Pulsar Xlite v3 eS | Zowie EC2-CW | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Medium |
Length mm | 122.0 | 123.0 |
Width mm | 67.0 | 65.0 |
Height mm | 43.0 | 42.0 |
Weight grams | 65.0 | 77.0 |
Category | Ergonomic | Ergonomic |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Center |
Front flare | Outward - moderate | Outward - moderate |
Side curvature | Inward | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (56%) | Centered (50%) |
DPI | 26000 | 3200 |
Polling rate Hz | 8000 | 1000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 400 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 50 |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | RAESHA Optical Optical 90M | Huano Black Shell Blue Dot Mechanical 10M |
Encoder | Pulsar Blue Encoder | Zowie Optical (24 steps) |
Connectivity | Wireless | Wireless |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |