Zowie EC2-DW vs LAMZU Thorn V2 - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The LAMZU Thorn V2 is slightly larger than the Zowie EC2-DW. The LAMZU Thorn V2 weighs 8% less than the Zowie EC2-DW. The LAMZU Thorn V2 has a slightly better sensor (PixArt PAW NEXT I) than the Zowie EC2-DW (PixArt PAW3950). The LAMZU Thorn V2 has the highest max DPI of 50000, while Zowie EC2-DW has a max DPI of 3200. The Zowie EC2-DW uses the Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks, while the LAMZU Thorn V2 uses the Kailh Optical V2 switches rated for 150 million clicks. The Zowie EC2-DW uses the Zowie Optical (24 steps) encoder, while the LAMZU Thorn V2 uses the RAESHA Optical encoder. The LAMZU Thorn V2 has the highest polling rate of 8000 Hz, while the Zowie EC2-DW has a polling rate of 4000 Hz. Both mice are wireless.
Zowie EC2-DW | LAMZU Thorn V2 | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Large |
Length mm | 123.0 | 124.0 |
Width mm | 65.0 | 66.0 |
Height mm | 42.0 | 42.0 |
Weight grams | 60.0 | 55.0 |
Category | Ergonomic | Ergonomic |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Center |
Front flare | Outward - moderate | Outward - slight |
Side curvature | Inward | Inward |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Centered (50%) | Forward (55%) |
MCU | ||
DPI | 3200 | 50000 |
Polling rate Hz | 4000 | 8000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 750 | 880 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 80 |
Wired | Yes (USB-C) | Yes (USB-C) |
Wireless | Yes (2.4 GHz) | Yes (2.4 GHz) |
Bluetooth | No | No |
Hot-swap battery | No | No |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 0 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot Mechanical 80M | Kailh Optical V2 Optical 150M |
Encoder | Zowie Optical (24 steps) | RAESHA Optical |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |