LAMZU MAYA vs HyperX Pulsefire Haste - Mouse Comparison - EloShapes
The HyperX Pulsefire Haste is larger than the LAMZU MAYA. The LAMZU MAYA weighs 24% less than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste. The LAMZU MAYA has a much better sensor (PixArt PAW3395) than the HyperX Pulsefire Haste (PixArt PAW3335). The LAMZU MAYA has the highest max DPI of 26000, while HyperX Pulsefire Haste has a max DPI of 16000. The LAMZU MAYA uses the Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot mechanical switches rated for 80 million clicks, while the HyperX Pulsefire Haste uses the TTC Dustproof Gold 60M mechanical switches rated for 60 million clicks. The LAMZU MAYA is wireless, while the HyperX Pulsefire Haste is wired. Both mice use the TTC Silver mechanical encoder. Both mice have a polling rate of 1000 Hz.
LAMZU MAYA | HyperX Pulsefire Haste | |
|---|---|---|
Category | Medium | Medium |
Length mm | 119.0 | 124.2 |
Width mm | 62.0 | 66.8 |
Height mm | 38.0 | 38.2 |
Weight grams | 45.0 | 59.0 |
Category | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Hand compatibility | Right | Right |
Hump placement | Center | Center |
Front flare | Outward - slight | Flat |
Side curvature | Inward | Flat |
Thumb rest | No | No |
Ring finger rest | No | No |
Name | ||
Type | Optical | Optical |
Position | Forward (54%) | Forward (54%) |
MCU | - | |
DPI | 26000 | 16000 |
Polling rate Hz | 1000 | 1000 |
Tracking speed IPS | 650 | 400 |
Acceleration G | 50 | 40 |
Wired | Yes (USB-C) | Yes (Non-detachable) |
Wireless | Yes (2.4 GHz) | No |
Bluetooth | No | No |
Hot-swap battery | No | No |
Side buttons | 2 | 2 |
Middle buttons | 0 | 1 |
Hot-swap switches | No | No |
Switches | Huano Transparent Blue Shell Pink Dot Mechanical 80M | TTC Dustproof Gold 60M Mechanical 60M |
Encoder | TTC Silver Mechanical 24 steps | TTC Silver Mechanical 24 steps |
Free spin | No | No |
Side tilt | No | No |
Thumb wheel | No | No |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |